Information System Policy

Needs About Information Systems

Here are the criteria to select an information system that were proposed: The Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) is composed from the costs of the set-up and the operating costs.

Here are the criteria to select an information system according the business lines:

Topics
Rating of the criteria as a solution for an information system
762
Business line
Adequation to the organization
Adequation to the business
Operating costs
Costs to set-up
Delays to set-up
Integrating to what is existing
Customization
Operating flexibility
Usage for the employee
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
85214300091551071
2069449631012341219184
10391500450821369
164919911241201112118
8091992105416712101
70230653731701495
400101004380032
400220400110026
600724569153966
Ratio
9%
24%
9%
15%
13%
12%
4%
3%
9%

To keep in mind:
The Information and Communication New Technologies (ICNT) are not a revolution for the activities of the firm since it is merely lived as a progress as another can be - 92%.

An information system is above all a working tool for operational employees - 33%.

Since the willing of information system planning is often present, the capacity to integrate it fully into the environment - other information systems, end-user desktop, operating - is the second macro-criterion - 29% -, which is logical.

The third criterion, Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), is used to evaluate if the investment is attractive by computing a return on investment - 26%. It is usually in fact the payback!

Externalization

Here is what the actors claim by themselves to externalize for building an information system:

Topics
Externalization
69
Business line
Assistance to WPO
Assistance to users
Expertise
Operating
Facilities Management
Hosting
Realization of large projects
Realization of small and large projects
Third-party application maintaining
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
0000000002103
0100100000002
0010210012018
1001001000003
1001000000002
0000000001012
20131122221219
11150100241218
30150010011012
Ratio
4%
3%
12%
4%
3%
3%
28%
26%
17%
Topics
Integrators, consultancy offices and IT services companies
68
Business line
All integrators or IT services companies
Main companies only:
- Aston
- Atos
- Cap Gemini Ernst & Young
- Euriware
- Focal Ingénierie
- GFI
- Hewlett Packard
- IBM Global Services
- Sema Schlumberger
- Sopra
- Sql Ingénierie
- Stéria
- Thalès
- Unilog
Other consulting companies:
- Accenture
- KPMG
IT services and offshore companies
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
11030101010311
0000000001001
0000001000102
2012000000005
10220020132013
0001000000001
0000000000011
0010000001002
0001000020001
11030020021010
1000000101003
0001002101106
0000000000011
0000000001001
1000000000012
0011000101004
0000000000000
1020001000104
0000000001001
0001100000002
Ratio
15%
1%
3%
7%
18%
1%
1%
3%
1%
14%
4%
8%
1%
1%
3%
6%
0%
6%
1%
3%

To keep in mind:
The building and the maintaining of the information system are externalized when the one is not a critical resource for the core business while the functional design stays internal.

There are however numerous large industrial companies that look like integrators due to their out-sourcing policy. Their business is thus the master of the know how and of the information.

The business line of IT services companies is very concentrated: the two first would have as much weight as all the other actors without the twenty first ones! With a same offer at the same cost, the firms choose the brands that make feel secure. Few of them are however using truly offshore services.

IT Equipment

Vertical software

Here is the generic vertical software to be integrated that the actors claim by themselves to use to build an information system:

Topic
Vertical software
79
Business line
- Arcview
- Astre
- BSCS
- Business Ware
- Catia
- Celigent
- Genesys
- Infranet
- JD Edwards
- Hyperion
- Kabira
- Manugistic
- Mapinfo
- Metaphase
- Oracle Applications
- Peoplesoft
- SAB
- SAP
- SAS
- Retek
- Shared Access
- Siebel
Other software
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
0000000001001
0000000001001
0000200000103
1000000000001
0003000000003
0010000000001
1000000000102
0000100000001
0002000000002
0010000000001
0000000000101
0002000000002
0000000001001
0001000000001
20030011011211
00031010211211
1000000000001
11261010002216
0010000001002
0100000000001
0010000011014
1001101000105
2002101000028
Ratio
1%
1%
4%
1%
4%
1%
3%
1%
3%
1%
1%
3%
1%
1%
14%
14%
1%
20%
3%
1%
5%
5%
10%

To keep in mind:
The selected solutions are very fragmented even if three actors are emerging: SAP - 19% - Oracle Applications - 14% - and Peoplesoft - 14%. You can notice the number of starting projects based on Shared Access from IBM.

Come back to the top of page...

Hardware and Technical Software

Here are the hardware and the technical software that the actors claim by themselves to use to build an information system:

Topics
Architecture
37
Business line
Client-server
Intranet - Free software
Intranet - Java J2EE
Intranet - Microsoft ASP
Intranet - Microsoft .NET
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
1,50,51,33,531,50,50,50,511,81,5317,2
0,3300,30,33000001,3002,32
1,8300,31,8300,130,50,803,80,509,7
0,330,50000,2510,80000,84,08
0002,30,50,13000,5000,33,68
Ratio
45%
6%
27%
11%
10%
Topics
Programming language
36
Business line
Access
C / C++
Cobol
Developer 2000
Java
Visual Basic / Delphi / Other 4GL
Other developing languages
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
0000000001001
1,3300,310,50,3310,5011,50,58,49
0,8300,30000,5000001,66
0000000100001
1,330,50,320,500,30,503,50,509,49
0,50,514,5100,3020,503,513,8
0000000001001
Ratio
3%
23%
5%
3%
26%
38%
3%
Topics
Platform - Operating system
37
Business line
IBM or Bull mainframe
Windows
Unix
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
1,1600,30000000,500,52,49
1,160,50,651,50,51123,51219,5
1,660,50,630,50,5110311,514,2
Ratio
7%
54%
39%
Topics
Platform - Data exchanges
37
Business line
Private file format
Etebac
Tuxedo
Xml
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
0,50,31,3610,511030,52,317,4
20,30,30000000,50,50,33,91
0,5001000001,50,50,33,75
10,30,3110,511120,51,311,9
Ratio
46%
11%
10%
33%
Topics
Platform - Databases
37
Business line
Db2
Informix
Ingres
Oracle
Postgress
Sql Server
Sybase
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
1,830,30,50,5000,50010,505,08
0000000000,5000,5
0000000000,5000,5
1,830,50,57,520,51,520,54,51,52,526,3
000000000000,50,5
00,30000,5001,50,5013,75
0,33000000000000,33
Ratio
14%
1%
1%
71%
1%
10%
1%
Topics
Platform - Market of free software
37
Business line
Core of business
Internet server
Operating system
Not used
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
0000000001001
00100100,501003,5
0,50020,300001014,75
3,51161,8021,5242327,8
Ratio
3%
10%
13%
74%

To keep in mind:
The client-server is not dead for two reasons: first numerous generic software to be integrated are not ready in thin client architecture; second the thin client architecture is not adapted for all purpose to the high producing work of operational employees.

There are now three families of languages to develop an information system: the Fourth Generation Languages (4GL) - 43% -, Java - 26% - and the traditional C / C++ reserved to specialists - 23%.

The entering of the free software - Linux, MySql, Apache, Php, etc. - stays weak and is almost limited to side applications as Intranet / Internet servers. This can be explained by the lack of confidence for free software that belongs to anyone but also to nobody.

Project Management

Process of the Project Management

Here is the process of the project management that the actors claim by themselves: Here is the process of project management by business lines:

Topics
Methodology
37
Business line
Incremental by batch
Traditional
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
21160010130116
20122112142321
Ratio
43%
57%
Topic
Use of a prototype
37
Business line
Yes
No
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
41181112271434
0000101000103
Ratio
92%
8%
Topics
Set-up
37
Business line
Switching
Parallel running
Incremental
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
1,860,504000,30,823,30,81,316
1,86001200,30,801,30,81,39,51
0,330,513011,30,302,30,31,311,5
Ratio
43%
26%
31%

To keep in mind:
All firms are using a mixed modeling, Merise - for databases - and Unified Modeling Language (UML) - for treatments. Only the most elementary concepts of Uml are used while all ones of Merise are quite almost used.

Project Indicators

Here are the indicators for the projects that the actors claim by themselves - the durations are in months and the budgets are in kilo Euros:

Busines lineMin durationMax durationMin budgetMax budgetStandard deviation of the min budgetStandard deviation of the max budget
Bank & insurance6,018,031510 0000%27%
Retailing3,018,0108 0000%0%
Energy6,021,05507 5000%20%
Industry6,420,61 03536 66718%63%
Engineering4,010,01053 50071%28%
Medias6,012,01007 0000%0%
Stipulators4,515,0305 00047%28%
Healthcare12,024,010050 00035%18%
Services9,021,010010 25047%20%
Public service10,630,01669 20048%26%
Telecom10,524,010022 50020%0%
Transports6,022,51555 2700%46%
Total7,421,933114 84247%43%

To keep in mind:
The more the business line is in competition, the more the projects are short. The rule is easy to understand:

Business lineRatio of the IT budget to the turnover
Bank & insurance4%
Retailing2%
Energy2%
Industry2%
Engineering3%
Medias3%
Healthcare4%
Services2%
Public service4%
Telecom6%
Transports2%

Analysis of the Causes of Failure

Failure of Suppliers

Here are the reasons that the actors declared by themselves not to select a solution - the criteria were already introduced previously:

Topics
Non-buying reasons
183
Business line
Operating constraint to high
Costs to high
Delays to important
No functional adequation
No organizational adequation
Non-compatible with the existing
Lack of confidence for the supplier
Lack of differenciation between the offers
Bad security level
Private technology
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
2000000000002
22073152155740
2000002000004
93317433661831186
0000000200002
20160000440118
31263200042427
2010000000003
0000000001001
0011000000002
Ratio
1%
22%
2%
46%
1%
10%
15%
2%
1%
1%

To keep in mind:
Almost one non-buying reason of two is the no-functional adequation - 47%. The firms are buying generic vertical software but want a specific one, which generates a high cost of the integration stage.

One supplier of six would be judged more over not serious enough according to the actors.

Come back to the top of page...

Failure of Projects

Here are the reasons that the actors claim by themselves that can explain the partial or full failure of a project - the criteria were already introduced previously:

Topics
Causes of failure of IT projects
178
Business line
Change in the perimeter
Non-respected delays
Hard integration
Lack of competencies
Lack of reliability
Lack of economical sense about the ROI
Lack of project management
Lack of functional analysis
Lack of design
Bad change management
Bad performance
BnARetEneIndEngMedStiHeaSerPSrTelTraTotal
1014012010009
30030202230217
0030000000003
0002300000207
10000011331212
53190300000021
20230000003010
601650660143955
20020020030211
001620020100424
0000000052209
Ratio
6%
9%
2%
4%
7%
12%
6%
31%
6%
14%
5%

To keep in mind:
The four main macro-reasons of a failure of a project are the following: Come back to the top of page...